[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZTZ-3Vick1LBRKYb@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 16:10:37 +0200
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Krishna Kurapati PSSNV <quic_kriskura@...cinc.com>
Cc: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@...opsys.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Wesley Cheng <quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
quic_pkondeti@...cinc.com, quic_ppratap@...cinc.com,
quic_jackp@...cinc.com, ahalaney@...hat.com,
quic_shazhuss@...cinc.com, Harsh Agarwal <quic_harshq@...cinc.com>,
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 03/10] usb: dwc3: core: Refactor PHY logic to support
Multiport Controller
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 06:03:32PM +0530, Krishna Kurapati PSSNV wrote:
> On 10/23/2023 2:41 PM, Johan Hovold wrote:
>
> >>>> Multiport currently.
> >>>
> >>> You use capitalised "Multiport" in several places it seems. Is this an
> >>> established term for these controllers or should it just be "multiport"
> >>> or "multiple ports"?
> >>>
> >> This is an established term AFAIK. So I've been using it here like this.
> >
> > Do you have a pointer? A google search seems to mostly come up with
> > links to this patch series.
>
> Only pointer I had is the hardware programming guide internally. It
> mentioned "Multiport" as an established term. I think that is self
> explanatory in usb context. Isn't it ?
Self-explanatory, yes, just not sure whether capitalising it as
"Multiport" is warranted. But thanks for clarifying where this comes
from.
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists