[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4FDF6E7A-C6E2-415D-A82B-342DAE6BD561@zytor.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2023 19:41:54 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: John Sperbeck <jsperbeck@...gle.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org
CC: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Zac Tang <zactang@...gle.com>, Cloud Hsu <cloudhsu@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/kexec: set MIN_KERNEL_LOAD_ADDR to 0x01000000
On October 22, 2023 7:31:21 PM PDT, John Sperbeck <jsperbeck@...gle.com> wrote:
>The physical memory range that kexec selects for the compressed
>bzimage target kernel, might not be where it runs from. The
>startup_64() code in head_64.S copies itself out of the way
>before the decompression so it doesn't clobber itself.
>
>If the start of the memory range selected by kexec is above
>LOAD_PHYSICAL_ADDR (0x01000000 by default), then the copy remains
>within the memory area. But if the start is below this range,
>then the copy will likely end up outside the range.
>
>Usually, this will be harmless because not much memory is in use
>at the time of the pre-decompression copy, so there is little
>to accidentally clobber. However, an unlucky choice for the
>adress of the kernel and the initrd could put the initrd in harm's
>way. For example:
>
> 0x00400000 - physical address for target kernel
> 0x03ff8000 - physical address of seven-page initrd
> 0x0302c000 - size of uncompressed kernel (about 50 Mbytes)
>
>The decompressed kernel will span 0x01000000 through 0x0402c000,
>which will overwrite the initrd.
>
>If the kexec code restricts itself to physical addresses above
>0x01000000, then the pre-decompression copy and the decompression
>itself will stay within the bounds of the memory kexec selected
>(unless a non-default value is used in the target kernel for
>CONFIG_PHYSICAL_START, which will change LOAD_PHYSICAL_ADDR,
>but that's probably unsolvable unless the target kernel were to
>somehow communicate this to kexec).
>
>Signed-off-by: John Sperbeck <jsperbeck@...gle.com>
>---
> arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c
>index a61c12c01270..d6bf6c13dab1 100644
>--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c
>+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kexec-bzimage64.c
>@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
> */
> #define MIN_PURGATORY_ADDR 0x3000
> #define MIN_BOOTPARAM_ADDR 0x3000
>-#define MIN_KERNEL_LOAD_ADDR 0x100000
>+#define MIN_KERNEL_LOAD_ADDR 0x1000000
> #define MIN_INITRD_LOAD_ADDR 0x1000000
>
> /*
This doesn't make any sense to me. There is already a high water mark for his much memory the kernel needs until an initrd or setup_data item can appear. This is just a hack, please fix it properly.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists