linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/137] 5.15.137-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <724521b8-9c63-4645-b3e0-30d9635573a7@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 23 Oct 2023 09:11:36 -0600
From:   Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/137] 5.15.137-rc1 review

Hello!

On 23/10/23 4:55 a. m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.137 release.
> There are 137 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Wed, 25 Oct 2023 10:47:57 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> 	https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.137-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> 	git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

We see lots of errors on Arm 32-bits:

-----8<-----
/builds/linux/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c:249:11: error: 'IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'IS_IMMUTABLE'?
   .flags = IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE | IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND
            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
            IS_IMMUTABLE
/builds/linux/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c:251:2: error: 'GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS' undeclared here (not in a function)
   GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS,
   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/builds/linux/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c:251:2: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
/builds/linux/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c:251:2: note: (near initialization for 'vf610_irqchip')
/builds/linux/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c: In function 'vf610_gpio_probe':
/builds/linux/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c:340:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'gpio_irq_chip_set_chip'; did you mean 'gpiochip_get_data'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
   gpio_irq_chip_set_chip(girq, &vf610_irqchip);
   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   gpiochip_get_data
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
----->8-----

Reported-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@...aro.org>

Affected builds:
* clang-17-defconfig                  arm
* clang-17-imx_v6_v7_defconfig        arm
* clang-17-lkftconfig                 arm
* clang-17-lkftconfig-no-kselftest-frag arm
* clang-nightly-lkftconfig-kselftest  arm
* gcc-8-defconfig                     arm
* gcc-8-imx_v6_v7_defconfig           arm
* gcc-12-defconfig                    arm
* gcc-12-lkftconfig                   arm
* gcc-12-lkftconfig-debug             arm
* gcc-12-lkftconfig-debug-kmemleak    arm
* gcc-12-lkftconfig-kasan             arm
* gcc-12-lkftconfig-kselftest         arm
* gcc-12-lkftconfig-kselftest-kernel  arm
* gcc-12-lkftconfig-kunit             arm
* gcc-12-lkftconfig-libgpiod          arm
* gcc-12-lkftconfig-no-kselftest-frag arm
* gcc-12-lkftconfig-perf              arm
* gcc-12-lkftconfig-perf-kernel       arm
* gcc-12-lkftconfig-rcutorture        arm

Greetings!

Daniel Díaz
daniel.diaz@...aro.org