[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZTaNaH8qo3Ho+yvL@ninjato>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 17:12:40 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To: Camel Guo <camel.guo@...s.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...s.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: exynos5: Calculate t_scl_l, t_scl_h according to
i2c spec
On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 10:59:43AM +0200, Camel Guo wrote:
> Previously the duty cycle was divided equally into h_scl_l, t_scl_h.
> This makes the low period of the SCL clock in Fast Mode is only 1.25us
> which is way lower than the minimal value (1.3) specified in i2c
> specification. In order to make sure t_scl_l, t_scl_h always fullfill
> i2c specification, this commit calculates t_scl_l using this formula:
>
> t_scl_l = clk_cycle *
> ((t_low_min + (scl_clock - t_low_min - t_high_min) / 2) / scl_clock)
>
> where:
> t_low_min is the minimal value of low period of the SCL clock in us;
> t_high_min is the minimal value of high period of the SCL clock in us;
> scl_clock is converted from SCL clock frequency into us.
>
> Signed-off-by: Camel Guo <camel.guo@...s.com>
Applied to for-next, thanks!
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists