linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 13/44] i2c: add HAS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZTaS8/Z4p8bLoHF1@ninjato>
Date:   Mon, 23 Oct 2023 17:36:19 +0200
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To:     Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 13/44] i2c: add HAS_IOPORT dependencies

On Sun, Sep 24, 2023 at 11:01:47PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 12:50:18PM +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> > In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends
> > not being declared. We thus need to add HAS_IOPORT as dependency for
> > those drivers using them.
> > 
> > Co-developed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
> 
> In RFC v1, you agreed to drop PARPORT [1]. Is there a reason you haven't
> done this so far?
> 
> [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-i2c/patch/20211227164317.4146918-11-schnelle@linux.ibm.com/

Shall I apply this with or without PARPORT?


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)