[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231023154216.376522-1-a929244872@163.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 23:42:16 +0800
From: wang wei <a929244872@....com>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: wang wei <a929244872@....com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: fix the potential memory waste in page_frag_alloc_align
First step, allocating a memory fragment with size 1KB bytes uses
page_frag_alloc_align. It will allocate PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_SIZE
bytes by __page_frag_cache_refill, store the pointer at nc->va and
then return the last 1KB memory fragment which address is nc->va
+ PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_SIZE - 1KB. The remaining PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_SIZE
- 1KB bytes of memory can Meet future memory requests.
Second step, if the caller requests a memory fragment with size
more then PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_SIZE bytes, page_frag_alloc_align,
it will also allocate PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_SIZE bytes by
__page_frag_cache_refill, store the pointer at nc->va, and
return NULL. this behavior makes the rest of
PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_SIZE - 1KB bytes memory at First step are
wasted(allocate from buddy system but not used).
So we should check the size of memory requests. If it beyound
PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_SIZE, we should return NULL directly.
Signed-off-by: wang wei <a929244872@....com>
---
mm/page_alloc.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
index 8cf86d0c6aa8..3182c648e86e 100644
--- a/mm/page_alloc.c
+++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
@@ -4757,6 +4757,9 @@ void *page_frag_alloc_align(struct page_frag_cache *nc,
struct page *page;
int offset;
+ if(unlikely(fragsz > PAGE_FRAG_CACHE_MAX_SIZE))
+ return NULL;
+
if (unlikely(!nc->va)) {
refill:
page = __page_frag_cache_refill(nc, gfp_mask);
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists