[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZTfjmM3nmeh+D5w/@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 18:32:40 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Russell King <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
x86@...nel.org, linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
jianyong.wu@....com, justin.he@....com,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 38/39] cpumask: Add enabled cpumask for present CPUs that
can be brought online
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 04:19:24PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> From: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
>
> The 'offline' file in sysfs shows all offline CPUs, including those
> that aren't present. User-space is expected to remove not-present CPUs
> from this list to learn which CPUs could be brought online.
>
> CPUs can be present but not-enabled. These CPUs can't be brought online
> until the firmware policy changes, which comes with an ACPI notification
> that will register the CPUs.
>
> With only the offline and present files, user-space is unable to
> determine which CPUs it can try to bring online. Add a new CPU mask
> that shows this based on all the registered CPUs.
...
> +static ssize_t print_cpus_enabled(struct device *dev,
> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
> +{
> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%*pbl\n", cpumask_pr_args(cpu_enabled_mask));
> +}
> +static DEVICE_ATTR(enabled, 0444, print_cpus_enabled, NULL);
Hmm... DEVICE_ATTR_RO() ?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists