linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/120] 5.4.259-rc2 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANV5eWBr-TLCQ-hWwqgi4MH8RWNuUjAmpAXMK3ujAubHx-CnQw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 24 Oct 2023 12:28:55 -0400
From:   Slade Watkins <sladewatkinslists@...il.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/120] 5.4.259-rc2 review

On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 4:37 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.259 release.
> There are 120 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 26 Oct 2023 08:32:40 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.4.259-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.

Hey Greg,
Tested on my x86_64 test server -- built and ran 5.4.259-rc2 with no
errors or regressions.

Tested-by: Slade Watkins <srw@...dewatkins.net>

All the best,
Slade