linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] dt-bindings: mailbox: Add property for CMDQ secure driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c04109bb54d6d4cf728488a8ed697df0b71f4e46.camel@mediatek.com>
Date:   Tue, 24 Oct 2023 16:37:05 +0000
From:   Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥) 
        <Jason-JH.Lin@...iatek.com>
To:     "jassisinghbrar@...il.com" <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
        "krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org" <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
        "chunkuang.hu@...nel.org" <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
        "angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com" 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org" 
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Singo Chang (張興國) 
        <Singo.Chang@...iatek.com>,
        Johnson Wang (王聖鑫) 
        <Johnson.Wang@...iatek.com>,
        Jason-ch Chen (陳建豪) 
        <Jason-ch.Chen@...iatek.com>,
        Shawn Sung (宋孝謙) 
        <Shawn.Sung@...iatek.com>,
        Nancy Lin (林欣螢) <Nancy.Lin@...iatek.com>,
        "jkardatzke@...gle.com" <jkardatzke@...gle.com>,
        "conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group 
        <Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] dt-bindings: mailbox: Add property for CMDQ secure
 driver

Hi Krzysztof,

Thanks for the reviews.

On Mon, 2023-10-23 at 09:49 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>  	 
> External email : Please do not click links or open attachments until
> you have verified the sender or the content.
>  On 23/10/2023 06:37, Jason-JH.Lin wrote:
> > Add mboxes to define a GCE loopping thread as a secure irq handler.
> > Add mediatek,gce-events to define a GCE event siganl sent from CMDQ
> > TA driver in secure world as a secure irq.
> > 
> > These 2 properties are required for CMDQ secure driver.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> >  .../bindings/mailbox/mediatek,gce-mailbox.yaml         | 10
> ++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git
> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mediatek,gce-mailbox.yaml 
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mediatek,gce-mailbox.yaml
> > index cef9d7601398..65fb93bb53b6 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mediatek,gce-
> mailbox.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mediatek,gce-
> mailbox.yaml
> > @@ -49,6 +49,16 @@ properties:
> >      items:
> >        - const: gce
> >  
> > +  mboxes:
> > +    maxItems: 1
> > +
> > +  mediatek,gce-events:
> > +    description:
> > +      The event id which is mapping to the specific hardware event
> signal
> > +      to gce. The event id is defined in the gce header
> > +      include/dt-bindings/gce/<chip>-gce.h of each chips.
> > +    $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32-array
> 
> Nothing improved.
> 
> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
> 
> It seems my previous comments were not fully addressed. Maybe my

Sorry, I didn't find your comments in the previous patch here:

https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20230918192204.32263-2-jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com/

Could you please comment again?
Thank you very much.


And I do see Rob's comment, so I sync the mediatek,gce-events property
definition from other yaml where used this property.

Should I also modify the definition of mediatek,gce-events property to
reference to mediatek,gce-mailbox.yaml for other yaml?

Regards,
Jason-JH.Lin

> feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you just forgot to apply
> it.
> Please go back to the previous discussion and either implement all
> requested changes or keep discussing them.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
> 
>