linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mempolicy: migration attempt to match interleave nodes: fix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 24 Oct 2023 17:45:12 +0100
From:   Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To:     Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc:     "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
        Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
        Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>,
        Sidhartha Kumar <sidhartha.kumar@...cle.com>,
        Vishal Moola <vishal.moola@...il.com>,
        Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mempolicy: migration attempt to match interleave nodes:
 fix

On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 09:32:44AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2023, Liam R. Howlett wrote:
> 
> > * Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com> [231024 02:50]:
> > > mm-unstable commit edd33b8807a1 ("mempolicy: migration attempt to match
> > > interleave nodes") added a second vma_iter search to do_mbind(), to
> > > determine the interleave index to be used in the MPOL_INTERLEAVE case.
> > > 
> > > But sadly it added it just after the mmap_write_unlock(), leaving this
> > > new VMA search unprotected: and so syzbot reports suspicious RCU usage
> > > from lib/maple_tree.c:856.
> > > 
> > > This could be fixed with an rcu_read_lock/unlock() pair (per Liam);
> > > but since we have been relying on the mmap_lock up to this point, it's
> > > slightly better to extend it over the new search too, for a well-defined
> > > result consistent with the policy this mbind() is establishing (rather
> > > than whatever might follow once the mmap_lock is dropped).
> > 
> > Would downgrading the lock work?  It would avoid the potential writing
> > issue and should still satisfy lockdep.
> 
> Downgrading the lock would work, but it would be a pointless complication.

I tend to agree.  It's also becoming far less important these days
with the vast majority of page faults handled under the per-VMA lock.
We might be able to turn it into a mutex instead of an rwsem without
seeing a noticable drop-off in performance.  Not volunteering to try this.