[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231024023328.GA29837@k08j02272.eu95sqa>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 10:33:28 +0800
From: "Hou Wenlong" <houwenlong.hwl@...group.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE 32-BIT AND 64-BIT" <x86@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"moderated list:XEN HYPERVISOR X86" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
"open list:X86 PLATFORM DRIVERS - ARCH"
<platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/xen/pvh: Set up percpu for stack canary in
32-bit kernel entry
On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 08:02:02PM +0800, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 12:10 PM Hou Wenlong
> <houwenlong.hwl@...group.com> wrote:
> >
> > In a 32-bit SMP kernel, the stack canary is a percpu variable accessed
> > as %fs:__stack_chk_guard. However, the ABI for PVH entry does not
> > specify the %fs register state. It currently works because the initial
> > %fs register is 0x10 for QEMU, which is the same as $PVH_DS_SEL.
>
> > %However, for added safety, the percpu should be set up explicitly
> > %before calling xen_prepare_pvh(), which accesses the stack canary.
>
> Stray leading % in two lines above.
>
Oh, sorry for that. It was added by mistake by my editor, and I didn't
carefully review it before sending.
Thanks!
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists