linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: allow tags between co-developed-by and their sign-off

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 24 Oct 2023 13:07:44 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>,
        Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
        Dwaipayan Ray <dwaipayanray1@...il.com>,
        Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>
Cc:     Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: allow tags between co-developed-by and
 their sign-off

On Mon, 2023-10-23 at 11:24 +0200, Przemek Kitszel wrote:
> On 10/21/23 00:34, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Fri, 2023-10-20 at 15:21 +0200, Przemek Kitszel wrote:
> > > Allow additional tags between Co-developed-by: and Signed-off-by:.
> > > Bump severity of missing SoB to ERROR.
[]
> > Unless this is accepted by various process folk,
> > and the documentation for it updated, I think this
> > should not be applied.
> 
> I will post v2 with docs updated. Would make it clear in commit message
> that immediateness of SoB after CdB was important for humans checking
> presence of both manually, and checkpatch has adopted such requirement
> for it's own comfort.

checkpatch does not adopt stuff "for it's own comfort".