[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231024222436.GG33965@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 00:24:36 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, rafael@...nel.org,
pavel@....cz, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/amd: Don't allow pre-emption in
amd_pmu_lbr_reset()
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 01:30:59PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> In that case - should preemption be disabled for all of x86_pmu_dying_cpu()
> perhaps?
>
> For good measure x86_pmu_starting_cpu() too?
starting and dying are with IRQs disabled.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists