lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 24 Oct 2023 15:19:28 +0800
From:   wangweidong.a@...nic.com
To:     broonie@...nel.org
Cc:     13916275206@....com, ajye_huang@...pal.corp-partner.google.com,
        alsa-devel@...a-project.org, arnd@...db.de,
        ckeepax@...nsource.cirrus.com, colin.i.king@...il.com,
        conor+dt@...nel.org, dan.carpenter@...aro.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, harshit.m.mogalapalli@...cle.com,
        herve.codina@...tlin.com, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
        lgirdwood@...il.com, linus.walleij@...aro.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, liweilei@...nic.com, perex@...ex.cz,
        rf@...nsource.cirrus.com, robh+dt@...nel.org, ryans.lee@...log.com,
        sebastian.reichel@...labora.com, shumingf@...ltek.com,
        tiwai@...e.com, trix@...hat.com, wangweidong.a@...nic.com,
        yijiangtao@...nic.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/4] ASoC: codecs: Add code for bin parsing compatible with aw88399

I'm very sorry, just sent the wrong patch, it was dut to my missteps.
Thank you very much for the review, but I have some questions 
I'd like to ask.

On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 13:29:03 +0100, broonie@...nel.org wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 04:34:25PM +0800, wangweidong.a@...nic.com wrote:
>> From: Weidong Wang <wangweidong.a@...nic.com>
>> 
>> Add aw88399 compatible code to the aw88395_lib.c file
>> so that it can parse aw88399's bin file.

> This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend:

> Applying: ASoC: codecs: Add code for bin parsing compatible with aw88399
> Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
> M	sound/soc/codecs/aw88395/aw88395_lib.c
> M	sound/soc/codecs/aw88395/aw88395_reg.h
> Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
> Auto-merging sound/soc/codecs/aw88395/aw88395_reg.h
> Auto-merging sound/soc/codecs/aw88395/aw88395_lib.c

I generated the patch based on the mainline branch, 
Why would there be a conflict? I know that I made a change to
this file when I committed aw87390 and that 
the change was in the Linux-next branch, but the two 
changes are in different parts of the file.

Best regards,
Weidong Wang


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ