[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20231024075748.1675382-3-dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 15:57:45 +0800
From: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>,
Zhang Xiong <xiong.y.zhang@...el.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@...gle.com>,
Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...el.com>,
Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [kvm-unit-tests Patch 2/5] x86: pmu: Change the minimum value of llc_misses event to 0
Along with the CPU HW's upgrade and optimization, the count of LLC
misses event for running loop() helper could be 0 just like seen on
Sapphire Rapids.
So modify the lower limit of possible count range for LLC misses
events to 0 to avoid LLC misses event test failure on Sapphire Rapids.
Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>
---
x86/pmu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/x86/pmu.c b/x86/pmu.c
index 0def28695c70..7443fdab5c8a 100644
--- a/x86/pmu.c
+++ b/x86/pmu.c
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ struct pmu_event {
{"instructions", 0x00c0, 10*N, 10.2*N},
{"ref cycles", 0x013c, 1*N, 30*N},
{"llc references", 0x4f2e, 1, 2*N},
- {"llc misses", 0x412e, 1, 1*N},
+ {"llc misses", 0x412e, 0, 1*N},
{"branches", 0x00c4, 1*N, 1.1*N},
{"branch misses", 0x00c5, 0, 0.1*N},
}, amd_gp_events[] = {
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists