linux-kernel - [PATCH v5 10/13] KVM: selftests: Test consistency of CPUID with num of gp counters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231024002633.2540714-11-seanjc@google.com>
Date:   Mon, 23 Oct 2023 17:26:30 -0700
From:   Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@...cent.com>,
        Like Xu <likexu@...cent.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 10/13] KVM: selftests: Test consistency of CPUID with num
 of gp counters

From: Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@...cent.com>

Add a test to verify that KVM correctly emulates MSR-based accesses to
general purpose counters based on guest CPUID, e.g. that accesses to
non-existent counters #GP and accesses to existent counters succeed.

Note, for compatibility reasons, KVM does not emulate #GP when
MSR_P6_PERFCTR[0|1] is not present (writes should be dropped).

Co-developed-by: Like Xu <likexu@...cent.com>
Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@...cent.com>
Signed-off-by: Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@...cent.com>
Co-developed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
 .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c  | 98 +++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 98 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c
index 410d09f788ef..274b7f4d4b53 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c
@@ -212,6 +212,103 @@ static void test_intel_arch_events(void)
 	}
 }
 
+/*
+ * Limit testing to MSRs that are actually defined by Intel (in the SDM).  MSRs
+ * that aren't defined counter MSRs *probably* don't exist, but there's no
+ * guarantee that currently undefined MSR indices won't be used for something
+ * other than PMCs in the future.
+ */
+#define MAX_NR_GP_COUNTERS	8
+#define MAX_NR_FIXED_COUNTERS	3
+
+#define GUEST_ASSERT_PMC_MSR_ACCESS(insn, msr, expect_gp, vector)		\
+__GUEST_ASSERT(expect_gp ? vector == GP_VECTOR : !vector,			\
+	       "Expected %s on " #insn "(0x%x), got vector %u",			\
+	       expect_gp ? "#GP" : "no fault", msr, vector)			\
+
+static void guest_rd_wr_counters(uint32_t base_msr, uint8_t nr_possible_counters,
+				 uint8_t nr_counters)
+{
+	uint8_t i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_possible_counters; i++) {
+		const uint32_t msr = base_msr + i;
+		const bool expect_success = i < nr_counters;
+
+		/*
+		 * KVM drops writes to MSR_P6_PERFCTR[0|1] if the counters are
+		 * unsupported, i.e. doesn't #GP and reads back '0'.
+		 */
+		const uint64_t expected_val = expect_success ? 0xffff : 0;
+		const bool expect_gp = !expect_success && msr != MSR_P6_PERFCTR0 &&
+				       msr != MSR_P6_PERFCTR1;
+		uint8_t vector;
+		uint64_t val;
+
+		vector = wrmsr_safe(msr, 0xffff);
+		GUEST_ASSERT_PMC_MSR_ACCESS(WRMSR, msr, expect_gp, vector);
+
+		vector = rdmsr_safe(msr, &val);
+		GUEST_ASSERT_PMC_MSR_ACCESS(RDMSR, msr, expect_gp, vector);
+
+		/* On #GP, the result of RDMSR is undefined. */
+		if (!expect_gp)
+			__GUEST_ASSERT(val == expected_val,
+				       "Expected RDMSR(0x%x) to yield 0x%lx, got 0x%lx",
+				       msr, expected_val, val);
+
+		vector = wrmsr_safe(msr, 0);
+		GUEST_ASSERT_PMC_MSR_ACCESS(WRMSR, msr, expect_gp, vector);
+	}
+	GUEST_DONE();
+}
+
+static void guest_test_gp_counters(void)
+{
+	uint8_t nr_gp_counters = this_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_PMU_NR_GP_COUNTERS);
+	uint32_t base_msr;
+
+	if (rdmsr(MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES) & PMU_CAP_FW_WRITES)
+		base_msr = MSR_IA32_PMC0;
+	else
+		base_msr = MSR_IA32_PERFCTR0;
+
+	guest_rd_wr_counters(base_msr, MAX_NR_GP_COUNTERS, nr_gp_counters);
+}
+
+static void test_gp_counters(uint8_t nr_gp_counters, uint64_t perf_cap)
+{
+	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+	struct kvm_vm *vm;
+
+	vm = pmu_vm_create_with_one_vcpu(&vcpu, guest_test_gp_counters);
+
+	vcpu_set_cpuid_property(vcpu, X86_PROPERTY_PMU_NR_GP_COUNTERS,
+				nr_gp_counters);
+	vcpu_set_msr(vcpu, MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES, perf_cap);
+
+	run_vcpu(vcpu);
+
+	kvm_vm_free(vm);
+}
+
+static void test_intel_counters(void)
+{
+	uint8_t nr_gp_counters = kvm_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_PMU_NR_GP_COUNTERS);
+	unsigned int i;
+	uint8_t j;
+
+	const uint64_t perf_caps[] = {
+		0,
+		PMU_CAP_FW_WRITES,
+	};
+
+	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(perf_caps); i++) {
+		for (j = 0; j <= nr_gp_counters; j++)
+			test_gp_counters(j, perf_caps[i]);
+	}
+}
+
 int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 {
 	TEST_REQUIRE(get_kvm_param_bool("enable_pmu"));
@@ -222,6 +319,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
 	TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PDCM));
 
 	test_intel_arch_events();
+	test_intel_counters();
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.42.0.758.gaed0368e0e-goog