linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/137] 5.15.137-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2023102453-backspin-immunize-b110@gregkh>
Date:   Tue, 24 Oct 2023 10:31:32 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 000/137] 5.15.137-rc1 review

On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 12:56:48PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/23/23 11:50, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > CC maz
> > 
> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 7:17 PM Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org> wrote:
> > > On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 at 09:11, Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org> wrote:
> > > > On 23/10/23 4:55 a. m., Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.15.137 release.
> > > > > There are 137 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > > let me know.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Responses should be made by Wed, 25 Oct 2023 10:47:57 +0000.
> > > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> > > > >        https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.15.137-rc1.gz
> > > > > or in the git tree and branch at:
> > > > >        git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.15.y
> > > > > and the diffstat can be found below.
> > > > > 
> > > > > thanks,
> > > > > 
> > > > > greg k-h
> > > > 
> > > > We see lots of errors on Arm 32-bits:
> > > > 
> > > > -----8<-----
> > > > /builds/linux/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c:249:11: error: 'IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE' undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 'IS_IMMUTABLE'?
> > > >     .flags = IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE | IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND
> > > >              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > >              IS_IMMUTABLE
> > > > /builds/linux/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c:251:2: error: 'GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS' undeclared here (not in a function)
> > > >     GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS,
> > > >     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > > /builds/linux/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c:251:2: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
> > > > /builds/linux/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c:251:2: note: (near initialization for 'vf610_irqchip')
> > > > /builds/linux/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c: In function 'vf610_gpio_probe':
> > > > /builds/linux/drivers/gpio/gpio-vf610.c:340:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'gpio_irq_chip_set_chip'; did you mean 'gpiochip_get_data'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> > > >     gpio_irq_chip_set_chip(girq, &vf610_irqchip);
> > > >     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > >     gpiochip_get_data
> > > > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> > > > ----->8-----
> > > 
> > > Bisection points to "gpio: vf610: make irq_chip immutable" (upstream
> > > commit e6ef4f8ede09f4af7cde000717b349b50bc62576).
> > 
> > IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE was introduced in commit 6c846d026d490b23 ("gpio:
> > Don't fiddle with irqchips marked as immutable") in v5.19.
> > Backporting (part of) that is probably not safe.
> > 
> 
> In this context: What exactly does commit e6ef4f8ede09 fix that makes it
> a stable release candidate ?

It is needed as a dependency for 430232619791 ("gpio: vf610: mask the
gpio irq in system suspend and support wakeup") which says it:
  Fixes: 7f2691a19627 ("gpio: vf610: add gpiolib/IRQ chip driver for Vybrid")
which was in the 3.19 kernel release.

That's why it was added.  And then none of my x86 builds caught this
build failure before I pushed out the -rcs.

thanks,

greg k-h