[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZTeeR7xHmMELgVGZ@linux.dev>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 10:36:55 +0000
From: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>
To: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@...gle.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@...wei.com>,
Shaoqin Huang <shahuang@...hat.com>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@...gle.com>,
Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@...gle.com>,
Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@...gle.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 13/13] KVM: selftests: aarch64: vPMU test for
immutability
On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 09:40:53PM +0000, Raghavendra Rao Ananta wrote:
> KVM marks some of the vPMU registers as immutable to
> userspace once the vCPU has started running. Add a test
> scenario to check this behavior.
>
> Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@...gle.com>
Now that PMCR_EL0.N is the only thing that's getting the immutability
treatment this patch fails. I'll probably drop it.
--
Thanks,
Oliver
Powered by blists - more mailing lists