[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZTejJo6io91n7e4H@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2023 13:57:42 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@...el.com>, rafael@...nel.org,
len.brown@...el.com, robert.moore@...el.com, mark.rutland@....com,
will@...nel.org, linux@...ck-us.net, Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
acpica-devel@...ts.linuxfoundation.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
mallikarjunappa.sangannavar@...el.com, bala.senthil@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] ACPI: utils: Introduce acpi_dev_uid_match() for
matching _UID
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 12:28:39PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 11:50:13AM +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
...
> > + * Returns:
> > + * - %true if matches.
> > + * - %false otherwise.
>
> Nit: these actually do not get formatted like above so you can just
> write it as
>
> Returns: %true in case UIDs match, %false otherwise.
>
> If it is even needed, I think it is pretty obvious from the function
> name what it returns.
kernel-doc complains if there is no Return: section in the text.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists