[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7516348d-fe6d-9768-049e-328cfcda89ee@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 11:44:19 +0800
From: Yang Jihong <yangjihong1@...wei.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
CC: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Nick Terrell <terrelln@...com>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@....com>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@...cle.com>,
Athira Rajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Yanteng Si <siyanteng@...ngson.cn>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>,
German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>,
Changbin Du <changbin.du@...wei.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
liuwenyu <liuwenyu7@...wei.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 20/50] perf record: Be lazier in allocating lost
samples buffer
Hello,
On 2023/10/25 6:23, Ian Rogers wrote:
> Wait until a lost sample occurs to allocate the lost samples buffer,
> often the buffer isn't necessary. This saves a 64kb allocation and
> 5.3kb of peak memory consumption.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> index 9b4f3805ca92..b6c8c1371b39 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> @@ -1924,21 +1924,13 @@ static void __record__save_lost_samples(struct record *rec, struct evsel *evsel,
> static void record__read_lost_samples(struct record *rec)
> {
> struct perf_session *session = rec->session;
> - struct perf_record_lost_samples *lost;
> + struct perf_record_lost_samples *lost = NULL;
> struct evsel *evsel;
>
> /* there was an error during record__open */
> if (session->evlist == NULL)
> return;
>
> - lost = zalloc(PERF_SAMPLE_MAX_SIZE);
> - if (lost == NULL) {
> - pr_debug("Memory allocation failed\n");
> - return;
> - }
> -
> - lost->header.type = PERF_RECORD_LOST_SAMPLES;
> -
> evlist__for_each_entry(session->evlist, evsel) {
> struct xyarray *xy = evsel->core.sample_id;
> u64 lost_count;
> @@ -1961,6 +1953,14 @@ static void record__read_lost_samples(struct record *rec)
> }
>
> if (count.lost) {
> + if (!lost) {
> + lost = zalloc(PERF_SAMPLE_MAX_SIZE);
> + if (!lost) {
> + pr_debug("Memory allocation failed\n");
> + return;
> + }
> + lost->header.type = PERF_RECORD_LOST_SAMPLES;
> + }
> __record__save_lost_samples(rec, evsel, lost,
> x, y, count.lost, 0);
> }
> @@ -1968,9 +1968,18 @@ static void record__read_lost_samples(struct record *rec)
> }
>
> lost_count = perf_bpf_filter__lost_count(evsel);
> - if (lost_count)
> + if (lost_count) {
> + if (!lost) {
> + lost = zalloc(PERF_SAMPLE_MAX_SIZE);
> + if (!lost) {
> + pr_debug("Memory allocation failed\n");
> + return;
> + }
> + lost->header.type = PERF_RECORD_LOST_SAMPLES;
> + }
> __record__save_lost_samples(rec, evsel, lost, 0, 0, lost_count,
> PERF_RECORD_MISC_LOST_SAMPLES_BPF);
> + }
> }
Can zalloc for `lost` be moved to __record__save_lost_samples?
This simplifies the code.
diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
index dcf288a4fb9a..8d2eb746031a 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
@@ -1888,14 +1888,25 @@ record__switch_output(struct record *rec, bool
at_exit)
}
static void __record__save_lost_samples(struct record *rec, struct
evsel *evsel,
- struct perf_record_lost_samples
*lost,
+ struct perf_record_lost_samples
**plost,
int cpu_idx, int thread_idx,
u64 lost_count,
u16 misc_flag)
{
struct perf_sample_id *sid;
struct perf_sample sample = {};
+ struct perf_record_lost_samples *lost = *plost;
int id_hdr_size;
+ if (!lost) {
+ lost = zalloc(PERF_SAMPLE_MAX_SIZE);
+ if (!lost) {
+ pr_debug("Memory allocation failed\n");
+ return;
+ }
+ lost->header.type = PERF_RECORD_LOST_SAMPLES;
+ *plost = lost;
+ }
+
lost->lost = lost_count;
if (evsel->core.ids) {
sid = xyarray__entry(evsel->core.sample_id, cpu_idx,
thread_idx);
@@ -1912,21 +1923,13 @@ static void __record__save_lost_samples(struct
record *rec, struct evsel *evsel,
static void record__read_lost_samples(struct record *rec)
{
struct perf_session *session = rec->session;
- struct perf_record_lost_samples *lost;
+ struct perf_record_lost_samples *lost = NULL;
struct evsel *evsel;
/* there was an error during record__open */
if (session->evlist == NULL)
return;
- lost = zalloc(PERF_SAMPLE_MAX_SIZE);
- if (lost == NULL) {
- pr_debug("Memory allocation failed\n");
- return;
- }
-
- lost->header.type = PERF_RECORD_LOST_SAMPLES;
-
evlist__for_each_entry(session->evlist, evsel) {
struct xyarray *xy = evsel->core.sample_id;
u64 lost_count;
@@ -1949,7 +1952,7 @@ static void record__read_lost_samples(struct
record *rec)
}
if (count.lost) {
- __record__save_lost_samples(rec,
evsel, lost,
+ __record__save_lost_samples(rec,
evsel, &lost,
x,
y, count.lost, 0);
}
}
@@ -1957,11 +1960,12 @@ static void record__read_lost_samples(struct
record *rec)
lost_count = perf_bpf_filter__lost_count(evsel);
if (lost_count)
- __record__save_lost_samples(rec, evsel, lost, 0,
0, lost_count,
+ __record__save_lost_samples(rec, evsel, &lost,
0, 0, lost_count,
PERF_RECORD_MISC_LOST_SAMPLES_BPF);
}
out:
- free(lost);
+ if (lost)
+ free(lost);
}
static volatile sig_atomic_t workload_exec_errno;
Thanks,
Yang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists