lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 25 Oct 2023 14:46:01 -0400
From:   Waiman Long <>
To:     Tejun Heo <>
Cc:     Zefan Li <>,
        Johannes Weiner <>,
        Jonathan Corbet <>,
        Lai Jiangshan <>,
        Shuah Khan <>,,,,
Subject: Re: [PATCH-cgroup 3/4] cgroup/cpuset: Keep track of CPUs in isolated

On 10/23/23 23:25, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Waiman.
> On Wed, Oct 18, 2023 at 02:24:00PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> If you mean saving the exclusion cpumask no matter who the caller is, we can
>> add another exclusion cpumask to save it and expose it to sysfs. This should
>> be done in the first workqueue patch, not as part of this patch. I expose
>> this isolated cpumask for testing purpose to be checked by the
>> script for correctness. As said, I can expose it without
>> cgroup_debug if you think the information is useful in general.
> I don't really care where the cpumask is in the source tree. I just want all
> the workqueue cpumasks presented to the userspace in a single place. Also, I
> think it makes sense to publish it to userspace in an easily accessible
> manner as what the eventual configuration ends up being can be confusing and
> the effect it has on the system subtle.

I have added 2 more read-only cpumask sysfs files in v2 to expose the 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists