linux-kernel - [PATCH V5 4/8] perf/x86/intel: Reorganize attrs and is

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20231025201626.3000228-4-kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 25 Oct 2023 13:16:22 -0700
From:   kan.liang@...ux.intel.com
To:     peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     mark.rutland@....com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
        jolsa@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org, irogers@...gle.com,
        adrian.hunter@...el.com, ak@...ux.intel.com, eranian@...gle.com,
        alexey.v.bayduraev@...ux.intel.com, tinghao.zhang@...el.com,
        Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH V5 4/8] perf/x86/intel: Reorganize attrs and is_visible

From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>

Some attrs and is_visible implementations are rather far away from one
another which makes the whole thing hard to interpret.

There are only two attribute groups which have both .attrs and
.is_visible, group_default and group_caps_lbr. Move them together.

No functional changes.

Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
---

New patch

 arch/x86/events/intel/core.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
index a99449c0d77c..584b58df7bf6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/core.c
@@ -5540,6 +5540,12 @@ static struct attribute *lbr_attrs[] = {
 	NULL
 };
 
+static umode_t
+lbr_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, int i)
+{
+	return x86_pmu.lbr_nr ? attr->mode : 0;
+}
+
 static char pmu_name_str[30];
 
 static ssize_t pmu_name_show(struct device *cdev,
@@ -5566,6 +5572,15 @@ static struct attribute *intel_pmu_attrs[] = {
 	NULL,
 };
 
+static umode_t
+default_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, int i)
+{
+	if (attr == &dev_attr_allow_tsx_force_abort.attr)
+		return x86_pmu.flags & PMU_FL_TFA ? attr->mode : 0;
+
+	return attr->mode;
+}
+
 static umode_t
 tsx_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, int i)
 {
@@ -5587,27 +5602,12 @@ mem_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, int i)
 	return pebs_is_visible(kobj, attr, i);
 }
 
-static umode_t
-lbr_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, int i)
-{
-	return x86_pmu.lbr_nr ? attr->mode : 0;
-}
-
 static umode_t
 exra_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, int i)
 {
 	return x86_pmu.version >= 2 ? attr->mode : 0;
 }
 
-static umode_t
-default_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *attr, int i)
-{
-	if (attr == &dev_attr_allow_tsx_force_abort.attr)
-		return x86_pmu.flags & PMU_FL_TFA ? attr->mode : 0;
-
-	return attr->mode;
-}
-
 static struct attribute_group group_events_td  = {
 	.name = "events",
 };
-- 
2.35.1