lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 25 Oct 2023 15:34:55 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <>, Joerg Roedel <>
Cc:     Jacob Pan <>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <>,
        Jiapeng Chong <>,
        Joao Martins <>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <>,
        Lu Baolu <>,
        Yi Liu <>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the iommufd tree with the iommu tree

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the iommufd tree got a conflict in:


between commit:

  c61c255e114c ("iommu/vt-d: Remove unused function")

from the iommu tree and commits:

  f35f22cc760e ("iommu/vt-d: Access/Dirty bit support for SS domains")
  cbf8b441ea08 ("iommu/vt-d: Add helper to setup pasid nested translation")

from the iommufd tree.

I fixed it up (the latter added a use of the function removed by
the former, so I just used the latter) and can carry the fix as
necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
when your tree is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider
cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
particularly complex conflicts.

Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists