linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/resctrl: mba_MBps: Fall back to total b/w if local b/w unavailable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZTmAFVuYlMuCbQHz@agluck-desk3>
Date:   Wed, 25 Oct 2023 13:52:37 -0700
From:   Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:     "Moger, Babu" <babu.moger@....com>
Cc:     Peter Newman <peternewman@...gle.com>,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com>,
        James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@...cinc.com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        patches@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/resctrl: mba_MBps: Fall back to total b/w if local
 b/w unavailable

On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 03:42:14PM -0500, Moger, Babu wrote:
> I meant, I was thinking bit different.
> 
> > 
> > You need these changes in only two functions, mbm_bw_count and
> > update_mba_bw. You decide which event you want to use based on availability,
> > 
> > Something like this. I updated mbm_bw_count.
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> > b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> > index 0ad23475fe16..302993e4fbc3 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> > @@ -436,8 +436,16 @@ static int __mon_event_count(u32 rmid, struct
> > rmid_read *rr)
> >   */
> >  static void mbm_bw_count(u32 rmid, struct rmid_read *rr)
> >  {
> > -       struct mbm_state *m = &rr->d->mbm_local[rmid];
> >         u64 cur_bw, bytes, cur_bytes;
> > +       struct mbm_state *m;
> > +       int evtid;
> > +
> > +       if (is_mbm_local_enabled())
> > +               evtid = QOS_L3_MBM_LOCAL_EVENT_ID;
> > +       else
> > +               evtid = QOS_L3_MBM_TOTAL_EVENT_ID;
> > +
> > +       m = get_mbm_state(rr->d, rmid, evtid);

Ok. Yes. That seems simpler.

Maybe I should just set a global "mbm_evtid" at mount
time. No need to check every time to see if is_mbm_local_enabled()
somehow changed and local b/w measurements were suddenly
available!

-Tony