[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20231025212806.pgykrxzcmbhrhix5@treble>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 14:28:06 -0700
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
Cc: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, tony.luck@...el.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Alyssa Milburn <alyssa.milburn@...ux.intel.com>,
Daniel Sneddon <daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com>,
antonio.gomez.iglesias@...ux.intel.com,
Alyssa Milburn <alyssa.milburn@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] x86/bugs: Add asm helpers for executing VERW
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 10:10:41PM +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 25/10/2023 9:52 pm, Pawan Gupta wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry.S
> > index bfb7bcb362bc..f8ba0c0b6e60 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/entry/entry.S
> > +++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry.S
> > @@ -20,3 +23,16 @@ SYM_FUNC_END(entry_ibpb)
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(entry_ibpb);
> >
> > .popsection
> > +
> > +.pushsection .entry.text, "ax"
> > +
> > +.align L1_CACHE_BYTES, 0xcc
> > +SYM_CODE_START_NOALIGN(mds_verw_sel)
> > + UNWIND_HINT_UNDEFINED
> > + ANNOTATE_NOENDBR
> > + .word __KERNEL_DS
>
> You need another .align here. Otherwise subsequent code will still
> start in this cacheline and defeat the purpose of trying to keep it
> separate.
>
> > +SYM_CODE_END(mds_verw_sel);
>
> Thinking about it, should this really be CODE and not a data entry?
>
> It lives in .entry.text but it really is data and objtool shouldn't be
> writing ORC data for it at all.
>
> (Not to mention that if it's marked as STT_OBJECT, objdump -d will do
> the sensible thing and not even try to disassemble it).
>
> ~Andrew
>
> P.S. Please CC on the full series. Far less effort than fishing the
> rest off lore.
+1 to putting it in .rodata or so.
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists