linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v8 0/7] Add MACsec support for TJA11XX C45 PHYs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231025154044.7877e5c0@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 25 Oct 2023 15:40:44 -0700
From:   Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To:     "Radu Pirea (OSS)" <radu-nicolae.pirea@....nxp.com>
Cc:     sd@...asysnail.net, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
        pabeni@...hat.com, andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com,
        linux@...linux.org.uk, richardcochran@...il.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        sebastian.tobuschat@....nxp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v8 0/7] Add MACsec support for TJA11XX C45 PHYs

On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 15:18:34 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 19:21:24 +0300 Radu Pirea (OSS) wrote:
> > The state of this patch series was set to "Changes Requested", but no 
> > change was requested in V8 and I addressed the changes requested in V7. 
> > Am I missing something or is it a mistake?  
> 
> Another series got silently discarded because of a conflict.
> This one IDK. Everything looks fine. So let me bring it back, sorry.

Ugh, I found out why. It has already been applied :|