[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2023102520-salvage-fancied-b186@gregkh>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 08:22:30 +0200
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the rockchip tree
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 02:33:26PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the usb tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588s.dtsi
>
> between commit:
>
> 5a6976b1040a ("arm64: dts: rockchip: Add DFI to rk3588s")
>
> from the rockchip tree and commit:
>
> bbd3778da16b ("arm64: dts: rockchip: rk3588s: Add USB3 host controller")
>
> from the usb tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
Looks good to me, thanks
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists