linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] nvme-tcp: always set valid seq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 25 Oct 2023 08:33:08 +0200
From:   Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
To:     Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
        Mark O'Donovan <shiftee@...teo.net>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
        sagi@...mberg.me, hch@....de, axboe@...nel.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] nvme-tcp: always set valid seq_num in dhchap reply

On 10/24/23 18:40, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 02:00:00PM +0000, Mark O'Donovan wrote:
>> The first patch is a small unrelated fix which makes it clear that the
>> response data section of the Success1 message is not optional.
>>
>> The second patch removes use of the host sequence number (S2) as an
>> indicator of bi-directional authentication.
>>
>> The third patch causes us to always set the host sequence number (S2)
>> to a non-zero value instead of the 0 value reserved for the secure
>> channel feature.
> 
> Should these go in now for 6.6? We're pretty close to the end. If for
> 6.7, there is a merge conflict that I think would be easiest resolved if
> I wait until the block tree resyncs after the 6.7 merge window opens.
> 
I'd suggest to wait, as we'll need to fixup nvmet, too.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                Kernel Storage Architect
hare@...e.de                              +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev, Andrew
Myers, Andrew McDonald, Martje Boudien Moerman