[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM8PR11MB575134C301E7E17E72281CFAB8DEA@DM8PR11MB5751.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 06:50:05 +0000
From: "Wang, Xiao W" <xiao.w.wang@...el.com>
To: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
Samuel Holland <samuel.holland@...ive.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 2/4] riscv: Checksum header
Hi Charlie,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-riscv <linux-riscv-bounces@...ts.infradead.org> On Behalf Of
> Charlie Jenkins
> Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2023 2:45 AM
> To: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>; Palmer Dabbelt
> <palmer@...belt.com>; Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>; Samuel Holland
> <samuel.holland@...ive.com>; David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>;
> linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; linux-
> arch@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>; Albert Ou
> <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>; Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Subject: [PATCH v7 2/4] riscv: Checksum header
>
> Provide checksum algorithms that have been designed to leverage riscv
> instructions such as rotate. In 64-bit, can take advantage of the larger
> register to avoid some overflow checking.
>
> Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h | 79
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h
> b/arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..dc0dd89f2a13
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/checksum.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/*
> + * IP checksum routines
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2023 Rivos Inc.
> + */
> +#ifndef __ASM_RISCV_CHECKSUM_H
> +#define __ASM_RISCV_CHECKSUM_H
> +
> +#include <linux/in6.h>
> +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
> +
> +#define ip_fast_csum ip_fast_csum
> +
> +#include <asm-generic/checksum.h>
> +
> +/*
> + * Quickly compute an IP checksum with the assumption that IPv4 headers
> will
> + * always be in multiples of 32-bits, and have an ihl of at least 5.
> + * @ihl is the number of 32 bit segments and must be greater than or equal
> to 5.
> + * @iph is assumed to be word aligned.
Not sure if the assumption is always true. It looks the implementation in "lib/checksum.c" doesn't take this assumption.
The ip header can comes after a 14-Byte ether header, which may start from a word-aligned or DMA friendly address.
> + */
> +static inline __sum16 ip_fast_csum(const void *iph, unsigned int ihl)
> +{
> + unsigned long csum = 0;
> + int pos = 0;
> +
> + do {
> + csum += ((const unsigned int *)iph)[pos];
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_32BIT))
> + csum += csum < ((const unsigned int *)iph)[pos];
> + } while (++pos < ihl);
> +
> + /*
> + * ZBB only saves three instructions on 32-bit and five on 64-bit so not
> + * worth checking if supported without Alternatives.
> + */
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_ZBB) &&
> + IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ALTERNATIVE)) {
> + unsigned long fold_temp;
> +
> + asm_volatile_goto(ALTERNATIVE("j %l[no_zbb]", "nop", 0,
> + RISCV_ISA_EXT_ZBB, 1)
> + :
> + :
> + :
> + : no_zbb);
> +
> + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_32BIT)) {
> + asm(".option push \n\
> + .option arch,+zbb \n\
> + not %[fold_temp], %[csum]
> \n\
> + rori %[csum], %[csum], 16 \n\
> + sub %[csum], %[fold_temp], %[csum]
> \n\
> + .option pop"
> + : [csum] "+r" (csum), [fold_temp] "=&r" (fold_temp));
> + } else {
> + asm(".option push \n\
> + .option arch,+zbb \n\
> + rori %[fold_temp], %[csum], 32 \n\
> + add %[csum], %[fold_temp], %[csum]
> \n\
> + srli %[csum], %[csum], 32 \n\
> + not %[fold_temp], %[csum]
> \n\
> + roriw %[csum], %[csum], 16 \n\
> + subw %[csum], %[fold_temp], %[csum]
> \n\
> + .option pop"
> + : [csum] "+r" (csum), [fold_temp] "=&r" (fold_temp));
> + }
> + return csum >> 16;
> + }
> +no_zbb:
> +#ifndef CONFIG_32BIT
> + csum += (csum >> 32) | (csum << 32);
Just like patch 3/4 does, we can call ror64(csum, 32).
BRs,
Xiao
> + csum >>= 32;
> +#endif
> + return csum_fold((__force __wsum)csum);
> +}
> +
> +#endif // __ASM_RISCV_CHECKSUM_H
>
> --
> 2.42.0
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
Powered by blists - more mailing lists