lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 25 Oct 2023 09:16:47 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc:     Binbin Zhou <zhoubb.aaron@...il.com>,
        Jonas Gorski <jonas.gorski@...il.com>,
        Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
        Binbin Zhou <zhoubinbin@...ngson.cn>,
        Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        loongson-kernel@...ts.loongnix.cn, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, diasyzhang@...cent.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, frowand.list@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: loongson,liointc:
 Fix warnings about liointc-2.0

On 25/10/2023 03:56, Huacai Chen wrote:
> Hi, Krzysztof,
> 
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 8:18 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 10:51:35 +0100,
>> Binbin Zhou <zhoubb.aaron@...il.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Krzysztof & Marc:
>>>
>>> Sorry for the interruption.
>>> As said before, we tried to use the 'interrupt-map attribute' in our
>>> Loongson liointc dts(i), but there are some unfriendly points.
>>> Do you have any other different suggestions?
>>
>> I don't have any suggestion, but if you are still thinking of adding
>> some extra crap to the of_irq_imap_abusers[] array, the answer is a
>> firm 'NO'.
> Excuse me, but as described before, 'interrupt-map' cannot be used for
> liointc unless adding it to of_irq_imap_abusers[], can we still use
> 'parent_int_map' in this case? Or just change it to 'parent-int-map'
> to satisfy the naming style?

Why do you respond to me? You received firm 'NO' about
of_irq_imap_abusers, so how adhering to naming style or violating naming
style has anything to do with it?

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists