[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6d9c38efc2acb4eeb4c46e1bb9fa89d21e948982.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 00:55:45 +0000
From: Jason-JH Lin (林睿祥)
<Jason-JH.Lin@...iatek.com>
To: "jassisinghbrar@...il.com" <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
"angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
"chunkuang.hu@...nel.org" <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org"
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Singo Chang (張興國)
<Singo.Chang@...iatek.com>,
Johnson Wang (王聖鑫)
<Johnson.Wang@...iatek.com>,
Jason-ch Chen (陳建豪)
<Jason-ch.Chen@...iatek.com>,
Shawn Sung (宋孝謙)
<Shawn.Sung@...iatek.com>,
Nancy Lin (林欣螢) <Nancy.Lin@...iatek.com>,
"jkardatzke@...gle.com" <jkardatzke@...gle.com>,
"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group
<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] soc: mailbox: Add cmdq_pkt_finalize_loop to
support looping cmd with irq
On Mon, 2023-10-23 at 11:50 +0200, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 23/10/23 06:37, Jason-JH.Lin ha scritto:
> > Add cmdq_pkt_finalize_loop to CMDQ driver.
> >
> > cmdq_pkt_finalize_loop appends end of command(EOC) instruction and
> > jump to start of command buffer instruction to make the command
> > buffer loopable.
> >
> > GCE irq occurs when GCE executes to the EOC instruction.
> > CMDQ client can use a loop flag to mark the CMDQ packet as looping
> > packet. If the CMDQ packet is a loopping packet, GCE irq handler
> > won't delete the CMDQ task and disable the GCE thread.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jason-JH.Lin <jason-jh.lin@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c | 11 +++++++++++
> > drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq-helper.c | 23
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > include/linux/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.h | 1 +
> > include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-cmdq.h | 8 ++++++++
> > 4 files changed, 43 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
> > b/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
> > index 4d62b07c1411..56fe01cd9731 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c
>
> It's true that without the changes in soc/mediatek this is not doing
> anything, but
> mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c goes through a different maintainer...
>
> Please split the changes to drivers/mailbox/mtk-cmdq-mailbox.c and
> its header to a
> different commit.
>
> Hint:
> 1. soc: mediatek: cmdq: Add cmdq_pkt_finalize_loop for looping cmd
> with irq
> 2. mailbox: mtk-cmdq: Support GCE loop packets in interrupt handler
>
That's what I have done in the previous version.
Because of Krzysztof's comment here:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20230918192204.32263-8-jason-jh.lin@mediatek.com/#25527450
I squash them together. I'm not sure if I misunderstood that.
But I think I should follow the maintainer who can apply the patch.
So I'll split it in the next version.
Regards,
Jason-JH.Lin
> Thanks,
> Angelo
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists