[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <13c63dd3-011d-49a8-9db4-8135178e3cd1@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 10:53:26 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Stefan Hansson <newbyte@...tmarketos.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Add samsung-matisselte and common matisse dtsi
On 25/10/2023 10:52, Stefan Hansson wrote:
>
>
> On 2023-10-25 10:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 25/10/2023 10:37, Stefan Hansson wrote:
>>> This series adds a common samsung-matisse dtsi and reworks
>>> samsung-matisse-wifi to use it, and introduces samsung-matisselte. I
>>> choose matisselte over matisse-lte as this is how most other devices
>>> (klte, s3ve3g) do it and it is the codename that Samsung gave the
>>> device. See individual commits for more information.
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Changes since v1:
>>>
>>> - Rebased on latest linux-next
>>> - Added qcom,msm8226 compatible to matisselte inspired by recent Lumia
>>> 830 patch. This is done as in v1, the patch was rejected because I
>>> included the msm8226 dtsi despite not marking matisselte as
>>> compatible with msm8226, and I was not sure how to resolve that. As
>>> such, I'm copying what was done in the Lumia 830 (microsoft-tesla)
>>> patch given that it was accepted.
>>
>> One version per day, so you won't ignore tags.
>
> Sorry, I don't understand. Could you clarify what you mean? Thanks in
> advance.
Do not send more than one version of your patchset per 24h, if your
patchset is bigger than one patch.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists