lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 25 Oct 2023 10:53:26 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Stefan Hansson <newbyte@...tmarketos.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] Add samsung-matisselte and common matisse dtsi

On 25/10/2023 10:52, Stefan Hansson wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2023-10-25 10:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 25/10/2023 10:37, Stefan Hansson wrote:
>>> This series adds a common samsung-matisse dtsi and reworks
>>> samsung-matisse-wifi to use it, and introduces samsung-matisselte. I
>>> choose matisselte over matisse-lte as this is how most other devices
>>> (klte, s3ve3g) do it and it is the codename that Samsung gave the
>>> device. See individual commits for more information.
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Changes since v1:
>>>
>>>   - Rebased on latest linux-next
>>>   - Added qcom,msm8226 compatible to matisselte inspired by recent Lumia
>>>     830 patch. This is done as in v1, the patch was rejected because I
>>>     included the msm8226 dtsi despite not marking matisselte as
>>>     compatible with msm8226, and I was not sure how to resolve that. As
>>>     such, I'm copying what was done in the Lumia 830 (microsoft-tesla)
>>>     patch given that it was accepted.
>>
>> One version per day, so you won't ignore tags.
> 
> Sorry, I don't understand. Could you clarify what you mean? Thanks in 
> advance.

Do not send more than one version of your patchset per 24h, if your
patchset is bigger than one patch.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists