lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ZTjzCMtJY4DsnoXv@debian> Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 11:50:48 +0100 From: "Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)" <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com> To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de, conor@...nel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.4 000/120] 5.4.259-rc2 review Hi Greg, On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 10:36:44AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.4.259 release. > There are 120 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > let me know. > > Responses should be made by Thu, 26 Oct 2023 08:32:40 +0000. > Anything received after that time might be too late. Build test (gcc version 11.3.1 20230511): mips: 65 configs -> no failure arm: 106 configs -> no failure arm64: 2 configs -> no failure x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure alpha allmodconfig -> no failure powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure riscv allmodconfig -> no failure s390 allmodconfig -> no failure xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure Boot test: x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression. x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1] [1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/5374 Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@...ethink.co.uk> -- Regards Sudip
Powered by blists - more mailing lists