| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <202310251847.4T8BVZAZ-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 18:52:34 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Karan Tilak Kumar <kartilak@...co.com>, sebaddel@...co.com
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev, arulponn@...co.com,
djhawar@...co.com, gcboffa@...co.com, mkai2@...co.com,
satishkh@...co.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Karan Tilak Kumar <kartilak@...co.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/13] scsi: fnic: Modify ISRs to support multiqueue(MQ)
Hi Karan,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on mkp-scsi/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on jejb-scsi/for-next next-20231025]
[cannot apply to linus/master v6.6-rc7]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Karan-Tilak-Kumar/scsi-fnic-Modify-definitions-to-sync-with-VIC-firmware/20231021-031259
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mkp/scsi.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231020190629.338623-8-kartilak%40cisco.com
patch subject: [PATCH 07/13] scsi: fnic: Modify ISRs to support multiqueue(MQ)
config: x86_64-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231025/202310251847.4T8BVZAZ-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231025/202310251847.4T8BVZAZ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310251847.4T8BVZAZ-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_isr.c:242:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'fnic_set_intr_mode_msix' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
242 | int fnic_set_intr_mode_msix(struct fnic *fnic)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +/fnic_set_intr_mode_msix +242 drivers/scsi/fnic/fnic_isr.c
241
> 242 int fnic_set_intr_mode_msix(struct fnic *fnic)
243 {
244 unsigned int n = ARRAY_SIZE(fnic->rq);
245 unsigned int m = ARRAY_SIZE(fnic->wq);
246 unsigned int o = ARRAY_SIZE(fnic->hw_copy_wq);
247 unsigned int min_irqs = n + m + 1 + 1; /*rq, raw wq, wq, err*/
248
249 /*
250 * We need n RQs, m WQs, o Copy WQs, n+m+o CQs, and n+m+o+1 INTRs
251 * (last INTR is used for WQ/RQ errors and notification area)
252 */
253 FNIC_ISR_DBG(KERN_INFO, fnic->lport->host,
254 "fnic<%d>: %s: %d: rq-array size: %d wq-array size: %d copy-wq array size: %d\n",
255 fnic->fnic_num, __func__, __LINE__, n, m, o);
256 FNIC_ISR_DBG(KERN_INFO, fnic->lport->host,
257 "fnic<%d>: %s: %d: rq_count: %d raw_wq_count: %d wq_copy_count: %d cq_count: %d\n",
258 fnic->fnic_num, __func__, __LINE__, fnic->rq_count, fnic->raw_wq_count,
259 fnic->wq_copy_count, fnic->cq_count);
260
261 if (fnic->rq_count <= n && fnic->raw_wq_count <= m &&
262 fnic->wq_copy_count <= o) {
263 int vec_count = 0;
264 int vecs = fnic->rq_count + fnic->raw_wq_count + fnic->wq_copy_count + 1;
265
266 vec_count = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(fnic->pdev, min_irqs, vecs,
267 PCI_IRQ_MSIX | PCI_IRQ_AFFINITY);
268 FNIC_ISR_DBG(KERN_INFO, fnic->lport->host,
269 "fnic<%d>: %s: %d: allocated %d MSI-X vectors\n",
270 fnic->fnic_num, __func__, __LINE__, vec_count);
271
272 if (vec_count > 0) {
273 if (vec_count < vecs) {
274 FNIC_ISR_DBG(KERN_ERR, fnic->lport->host,
275 "fnic<%d>: %s: %d: interrupts number mismatch: vec_count: %d vecs: %d\n",
276 fnic->fnic_num, __func__, __LINE__, vec_count, vecs);
277 if (vec_count < min_irqs) {
278 FNIC_ISR_DBG(KERN_ERR, fnic->lport->host,
279 "fnic<%d>: %s: %d: no interrupts for copy wq\n",
280 fnic->fnic_num, __func__, __LINE__);
281 return 1;
282 }
283 }
284
285 fnic->rq_count = n;
286 fnic->raw_wq_count = m;
287 fnic->cpy_wq_base = fnic->rq_count + fnic->raw_wq_count;
288 fnic->wq_copy_count = vec_count - n - m - 1;
289 fnic->wq_count = fnic->raw_wq_count + fnic->wq_copy_count;
290 if (fnic->cq_count != vec_count - 1) {
291 FNIC_ISR_DBG(KERN_ERR, fnic->lport->host,
292 "fnic<%d>: %s: %d: CQ count: %d does not match MSI-X vector count: %d\n",
293 fnic->fnic_num, __func__, __LINE__, fnic->cq_count, vec_count);
294 fnic->cq_count = vec_count - 1;
295 }
296 fnic->intr_count = vec_count;
297 fnic->err_intr_offset = fnic->rq_count + fnic->wq_count;
298
299 FNIC_ISR_DBG(KERN_INFO, fnic->lport->host,
300 "fnic<%d>: %s: %d: rq_count: %d raw_wq_count: %d cpy_wq_base: %d\n",
301 fnic->fnic_num, __func__, __LINE__, fnic->rq_count,
302 fnic->raw_wq_count, fnic->cpy_wq_base);
303
304 FNIC_ISR_DBG(KERN_INFO, fnic->lport->host,
305 "fnic<%d>: %s: %d: wq_copy_count: %d wq_count: %d cq_count: %d\n",
306 fnic->fnic_num, __func__, __LINE__, fnic->wq_copy_count,
307 fnic->wq_count, fnic->cq_count);
308
309 FNIC_ISR_DBG(KERN_INFO, fnic->lport->host,
310 "fnic<%d>: %s: %d: intr_count: %d err_intr_offset: %u",
311 fnic->fnic_num, __func__, __LINE__, fnic->intr_count,
312 fnic->err_intr_offset);
313
314 vnic_dev_set_intr_mode(fnic->vdev, VNIC_DEV_INTR_MODE_MSIX);
315 FNIC_ISR_DBG(KERN_INFO, fnic->lport->host,
316 "fnic<%d>: %s: %d: fnic using MSI-X\n", fnic->fnic_num,
317 __func__, __LINE__);
318 return 0;
319 }
320 }
321 return 1;
322 } //fnic_set_intr_mode_msix
323
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
Powered by blists - more mailing lists