[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6e9feb75-386f-4bd2-a78c-75bee665a77b@linaro.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 13:55:28 +0200
From: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/8] arm64: dts: qcom: add initial SM8650 dtsi
On 25/10/2023 11:01, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>
>
> On 10/25/23 09:47, Neil Armstrong wrote:
>> Add initial DTSI for the Qualcomm SM8650 platform,
>> only contains nodes which doesn't depend on interconnect.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>
>> ---[...]
>
>> + CLUSTER_SLEEP_1: cluster-sleep-1 {
>> + compatible = "domain-idle-state";
>> + arm,psci-suspend-param = <0x4100c344>;
> I think this parameter signals the AOSS to attempt system
> suspend and CLUSTER_SLEEP is a shallower, separate state.
I have a doubt, I'll double check on this,
>
> [...]
>> + qcom,tcs-config = <ACTIVE_TCS 3>, <SLEEP_TCS 2>,
>> + <WAKE_TCS 2>, <CONTROL_TCS 0>;
> Is <CONTROL_TCS 0> the correct value?
I assume it is, I'll double check.
Thanks,
Neil
>
> I think it looks good otherwise
>
> Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists