[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANi1PHieGooO0DK=6BPwq0UknHzsn9QM3rFQkh3HLMfWxDseUQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 14:12:14 +0200
From: Jan Henrik Weinstock <jan@....re>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: oliver.upton@...ux.dev, james.morse@....com,
suzuki.poulose@....com, yuzenghui@...wei.com,
catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lukas Jünger <lukas@....re>
Subject: Re: KVM exit to userspace on WFI
Hi Marc,
Thanks for your feedback. I understand that request_interrupt_window
is not to be used. I assume a setting a flag is a better way,
something similar to KVM_ARCH_FLAG_RETURN_NISV_IO_ABORT_TO_USER, e.g.
KVM_ARCH_FLAG_WFX_EXIT_TO_USER.
I will also check that WFx traps are always enabled while this mode is
active to make sure userspace does not get blocked/scheduled out.
The reason for this is that we cannot have the thread that executes
KVM_RUN to be blocked or scheduled out whenever it hits a WFI.
Nop-WFIs are not a problem, since the PE will just continue executing
instructions, which is fine. We are currently using a timeout signal
that kicks KVM_RUN back into userspace, but we are seeing a lot of
time wasted because our KVM thread hangs in WFI/WFEs. It would be
better if we could just return from KVM_RUN immediately if the thread
would otherwise be blocked.
Thanks
Jan
Am Fr., 20. Okt. 2023 um 21:56 Uhr schrieb Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>:
>
> Hi Jan,
>
> On Fri, 20 Oct 2023 19:45:05 +0100,
> Jan Henrik Weinstock <jan@....re> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I am looking for a way to have KVM_RUN exit back to userspace once the
> > vcpu encounters a WFI. It seems the kvm_run->request_interrupt_window
> > flag is currently ignored by arm64.
>
> Well, that's consistent with arm64 not being an x86 implementation. We
> can inject interrupts any time, and there is no notion of "interrupt
> window".
>
> > So my solution thus far is to
> > patch kvm_handle_wfx in arch/arm64/kvm/handle_exit.c and return to
> > userspace with KVM_EXIT_IRQ_WINDOW_OPEN - working example attached.
> > Any chance to get this (or something similar) mainline?
>
> Certainly not as such. For start, this won't hit all WFIs, but only
> those that actively trap. And we don't even *try* to trap WFx in a
> number of cases (vcpu alone in its run queue and/or direct injection).
> There isn't even any guarantee that WFx is anything other than a NOP
> (it is architecturally only a hint), in which case no trap applies.
>
> So your "working example" really isn't one, as the architecture
> doesn't give you a way to do what you're asking for. If you want to
> cause an exit, writing to 'immediate_exit' and delivering a signal is
> the way.
>
> Thanks,
>
> M.
>
> --
> Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
--
Dr.-Ing. Jan Henrik Weinstock
Managing Director
MachineWare GmbH | www.machineware.de
Hühnermarkt 19, 52062 Aachen, Germany
Amtsgericht Aachen HRB25734
Geschäftsführung
Lukas Jünger
Dr.-Ing. Jan Henrik Weinstock
Powered by blists - more mailing lists