lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 25 Oct 2023 17:57:17 +0500
From:   Nikita Travkin <nikita@...n.ru>
To:     Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: mfd: qcom,spmi-pmic: Add pm8916
 vm-bms and lbc

Lee Jones писал(а) 25.10.2023 17:21:
> On Tue, 24 Oct 2023, Nikita Travkin wrote:
> 
>> Rob Herring писал(а) 23.10.2023 22:40:
>> > On Mon, 23 Oct 2023 11:20:32 +0500, Nikita Travkin wrote:
>> >> PM8916 (and probably some other similar pmics) have hardware blocks for
>> >> battery monitoring and charging. Add patterns for respecive nodes so the
>> >> devicetree for those blocks can be validated properly.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Nikita Travkin <nikita@...n.ru>
>> >> ---
>> >>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml | 6 ++++++
>> >>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>> >>
>> >
>> > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check'
>> > on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13):
>> >
>> > yamllint warnings/errors:
>> >
>> > dtschema/dtc warnings/errors:
>> > /builds/robherring/dt-review-ci/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/qcom,spmi-pmic.yaml:
>> > Error in referenced schema matching $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/power/supply/qcom,pm8916-bms-vm.yaml
>> >
>> > doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs):
>> >
>> > See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/devicetree-bindings/patch/20231023-pm8916-dtsi-bms-lbc-v2-1-343e3dbf423e@trvn.ru
>> >
>> > The base for the series is generally the latest rc1. A different dependency
>> > should be noted in *this* patch.
>> >
>>
>> Somehow I missed the memo and thought it tracks -next...
>>
>> This patch depends on 7f590e3831 and 5cee843d56 in linux-next.git
>> They were applied in [1].
>>
>> I'm wondering if the bot just bails out when the "depend" is present
>> or there is some more sophisticated logic to suggest the base to it?
> 
> So is this good to go, or not?

IMO this patch should be good, it passes the check on today's linux-next
on my end.

The only concern might be that if someone runs dt_binding_check on
for-mfd-next, it would skip that file with an error since there is no
dependency yet.

If this is critical to you, I was going to respin this after the -rc1,
but if you can pick the schema now, I can respin the remainder earlier.

Nikita

Powered by blists - more mailing lists