linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] x86/entry_64: Add VERW just before userspace transition

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ae3d993f-6ce4-42de-b9c4-ef0c7db663c0@intel.com>
Date:   Thu, 26 Oct 2023 12:40:49 -0700
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com>,
        Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@...e.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, tony.luck@...el.com,
        ak@...ux.intel.com, tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        Alyssa Milburn <alyssa.milburn@...ux.intel.com>,
        Daniel Sneddon <daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com>,
        antonio.gomez.iglesias@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] x86/entry_64: Add VERW just before userspace
 transition

On 10/26/23 12:29, Pawan Gupta wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 07:25:27PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>> On 25.10.23 г. 23:52 ч., Pawan Gupta wrote:
>>> @@ -1520,6 +1530,7 @@ SYM_CODE_START(ignore_sysret)
>>>   	UNWIND_HINT_END_OF_STACK
>>>   	ENDBR
>>>   	mov	$-ENOSYS, %eax
>>> +	CLEAR_CPU_BUFFERS
>> nit: Just out of curiosity is it really needed in this case or it's doesn
>> for the sake of uniformity so that all ring3 transitions are indeed
>> covered??
> Interrupts returning to kernel don't clear the CPU buffers. I believe
> interrupts will be enabled here, and getting an interrupt here could
> leak the data that interrupt touched.

Specifically NMIs, right?

X86_EFLAGS_IF should be clear here.