Message-ID: <CAOnJCU+dn5b1N_NOjODKBa8GKNC2XTyRvsECk_VFFO1U3pdOdQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 26 Oct 2023 12:41:45 -0700
From:   Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>
To:     Xu Lu <luxu.kernel@...edance.com>
Cc:     paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
        aou@...s.berkeley.edu, tglx@...utronix.de, maz@...nel.org,
        anup@...infault.org, dengliang.1214@...edance.com,
        liyu.yukiteru@...edance.com, sunjiadong.lff@...edance.com,
        xieyongji@...edance.com, lihangjing@...edance.com,
        chaiwen.cc@...edance.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        Clément Léger <cleger@...osinc.com>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [RFC 00/12] riscv: Introduce Pseudo NMI

On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 6:56 AM Xu Lu <luxu.kernel@...edance.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 7:02 AM Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 1:29 AM Xu Lu <luxu.kernel@...edance.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Sorry to resend this patch series as I forgot to Cc the open list before.
> > > Below is formal content.
> > >
> > > The existing RISC-V kernel lacks an NMI mechanism as there is still no
> > > ratified resumable NMI extension in RISC-V community, which can not
> > > satisfy some scenarios like high precision perf sampling. There is an
> > > incoming hardware extension called Smrnmi which supports resumable NMI
> > > by providing new control registers to save status when NMI happens.
> > > However, it is still a draft and requires privilege level switches for
> > > kernel to utilize it as NMIs are automatically trapped into machine mode.
> > >
> > > This patch series introduces a software pseudo NMI mechanism in RISC-V.
> > > The existing RISC-V kernel disables interrupts via per cpu control
> > > register CSR_STATUS, the SIE bit of which controls the enablement of all
> > > interrupts of whole cpu. When SIE bit is clear, no interrupt is enabled.
> > > This patch series implements NMI by switching interrupt disable way to
> > > another per cpu control register CSR_IE. This register controls the
> > > enablement of each separate interrupt. Each bit of CSR_IE corresponds
> > > to a single major interrupt and a clear bit means disablement of
> > > corresponding interrupt.
> > >
> > > To implement pseudo NMI, we switch to CSR_IE masking when disabling
> > > irqs. When interrupts are disabled, all bits of CSR_IE corresponding to
> > > normal interrupts are cleared while bits corresponding to NMIs are still
> > > kept as ones. The SIE bit of CSR_STATUS is now untouched and always kept
> > > as one.
> > >
> > > We measured performacne of Pseudo NMI patches based on v6.6-rc4 on SiFive
> > > FU740 Soc with hackbench as our benchmark. The result shows 1.90%
> > > performance degradation.
> > >
> > >   "hackbench 200 process 1000" (average over 10 runs)
> > >   +-----------+----------+------------+
> > >   |           | v6.6-rc4 | Pseudo NMI |
> > >   +-----------+----------+------------+
> > >   |   time    | 251.646s |  256.416s  |
> > >   +-----------+----------+------------+
> > >
> > > The overhead mainly comes from two parts:
> > >
> > >   1. Saving and restoring CSR_IE register during kernel entry/return.
> > >   This part introduces about 0.57% performance overhead.
> > >
> > >   2. The extra instructions introduced by 'irqs_enabled_ie'. It is a
> > >   special value representing normal CSR_IE when irqs are enabled. It is
> > >   implemented via ALTERNATIVE to adapt to platforms without PMU. This
> > >   part introduces about 1.32% performance overhead.
> > >
> >
> > We had an evaluation of this approach earlier this year and concluded
> > with the similar findings.
> > The pseudo NMI is only useful for profiling use case which doesn't
> > happen all the time in the system
> > Adding the cost to the hotpath and sacrificing performance for
> > everything for something for performance profiling
> > is not desirable at all.
>
> Thanks a lot for your reply!
>
> First, please allow me to explain that CSR_IE Pseudo NMI actually can support
> more than PMU profiling. For example, if we choose to make external major
> interrupt as NMI and use ithreshold or eithreshold in AIA to control which minor
> external interrupts can be sent to CPU, then we actually can support multiple
> minor interrupts as NMI while keeping the other minor interrupts still
> normal irqs.
> This is what we are working on now.
>

What's the use case for external interrupts to behave as NMI ?

Note: You can do the same thing with SSE as well if required. But I
want to understand the
use case first.

> Also, if we take virtualization scenarios into account, CSR_IE Pseudo NMI can
> support NMI passthrough to VM without too much effort from hypervisor, if only
> corresponding interrupt can be delegated to VS-mode. I wonder if SSE supports
> interrupt passthrough to VM?
>

Not technically interrupt pass through but hypervisor can invoke the
guest SSE handler
with the same mechanism. In fact, the original proposal specifies the
async page fault
as another use case for SSE.

> >
> > That's why, an SBI extension Supervisor Software Events (SSE) is under
> > development.
> > https://lists.riscv.org/g/tech-prs/message/515
> >
> > Instead of selective disabling of interrupts, SSE takes an orthogonal
> > approach where M-mode would invoke a special trap
> > handler. That special handler will invoke the driver specific handler
> > which would be registered by the driver (i.e. perf driver)
> > This covers both firmware first RAS and perf use cases.
> >
> > The above version of the specification is a bit out-of-date and the
> > revised version will be sent soon.
> > Clement(cc'd) has also done a PoC of SSE and perf driver using the SSE
> > framework. This resulted in actual saving
> > in performance for RAS/perf without sacrificing the normal performance.
> >
> > Clement is planning to send the series soon with more details.
>
> The SSE extension you mentioned is a brilliant design and does solve a lot of
> problems!
>
> We have considered implementing NMI via SBI calls before. The main problem
> is that if a driver using NMI needs to cooperate with SBI code, extra
> coupling will
> be introduced as the driver vendor and firmware vendor may not be the same one.
> We think perhaps it is better to keep SBI code as simple and stable as possible.
>

Yes. However, we also gain significant performance while we have a 2%
regression with
current pseudo-NMI approach. Quoting the numbers from SSE series[1]:

"Additionally, SSE event handling is faster that the
standard IRQ handling path with almost half executed instruction (700 vs
1590). Some complementary tests/perf measurements will be done."

Major infrastructure development is one time effort. Adding additional
sources of SSE effort will be minimal once
the framework is in place. The SSE extension is still in draft stage
and can accomodate any other use case
that you may have in mind. IMHO, it would better to define one
performant mechanism to solve the high priority
interrupt use case.

[1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg4982224.html
> Please correct me if there is any misunderstanding.
>
> Thanks again and looking forward to your reply.
>
> >
> > > Limits:
> > >
> > >   CSR_IE is now used for disabling irqs and any other code should
> > >   not touch this register to avoid corrupting irq status, which means
> > >   we do not support masking a single interrupt now.
> > >
> > >   We have tried to fix this by introducing a per cpu variable to save
> > >   CSR_IE value when disabling irqs. Then all operatations on CSR_IE
> > >   will be redirected to this variable and CSR_IE's value will be
> > >   restored from this variable when enabling irqs. Obviously this method
> > >   introduces extra memory accesses in hot code path.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > > TODO:
> > >
> > >   1. The adaption to hypervisor extension is ongoing.
> > >
> > >   2. The adaption to advanced interrupt architecture is ongoing.
> > >
> > > This version of Pseudo NMI is rebased on v6.6-rc7.
> > >
> > > Thanks in advance for comments.
> > >
> > > Xu Lu (12):
> > >   riscv: Introduce CONFIG_RISCV_PSEUDO_NMI
> > >   riscv: Make CSR_IE register part of context
> > >   riscv: Switch to CSR_IE masking when disabling irqs
> > >   riscv: Switch back to CSR_STATUS masking when going idle
> > >   riscv: kvm: Switch back to CSR_STATUS masking when entering guest
> > >   riscv: Allow requesting irq as pseudo NMI
> > >   riscv: Handle pseudo NMI in arch irq handler
> > >   riscv: Enable NMIs during irqs disabled context
> > >   riscv: Enable NMIs during exceptions
> > >   riscv: Enable NMIs during interrupt handling
> > >   riscv: Request pmu overflow interrupt as NMI
> > >   riscv: Enable CONFIG_RISCV_PSEUDO_NMI in default
> > >
> > >  arch/riscv/Kconfig                 | 10 ++++
> > >  arch/riscv/include/asm/csr.h       | 17 ++++++
> > >  arch/riscv/include/asm/irqflags.h  | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  arch/riscv/include/asm/processor.h |  4 ++
> > >  arch/riscv/include/asm/ptrace.h    |  7 +++
> > >  arch/riscv/include/asm/switch_to.h |  7 +++
> > >  arch/riscv/kernel/asm-offsets.c    |  3 +
> > >  arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S          | 18 ++++++
> > >  arch/riscv/kernel/head.S           | 10 ++++
> > >  arch/riscv/kernel/irq.c            | 17 ++++++
> > >  arch/riscv/kernel/process.c        |  6 ++
> > >  arch/riscv/kernel/suspend_entry.S  |  1 +
> > >  arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c          | 54 ++++++++++++++----
> > >  arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c              | 18 ++++--
> > >  drivers/clocksource/timer-clint.c  |  4 ++
> > >  drivers/clocksource/timer-riscv.c  |  4 ++
> > >  drivers/irqchip/irq-riscv-intc.c   | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c       | 21 ++++++-
> > >  18 files changed, 340 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.20.1
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Atish



-- 
Regards,
Atish

Powered by blists - more mailing lists