linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: mv64xxx: add reset-gpios property

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 26 Oct 2023 20:04:52 +0000
From:   Chris Packham <Chris.Packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
        "gregory.clement@...tlin.com" <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        "andi.shyti@...nel.org" <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org" 
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        "conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        "linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: i2c: mv64xxx: add reset-gpios
 property

(resend as plain text)


On 27/10/23 00:15, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>> +  reset-gpios:
>> +    description:
>> +      GPIO pin providing a common reset for all downstream devices. This GPIO
>> +      will be asserted then released before the downstream devices are probed.
> How about renaming this to "bus-reset-gpios"?
>
> Reason: When I read "reset-gpios", then I assume the device itself will
> be reset. In this case, the Marvell I2C controller. Some I2C mux devices
> and PCA9564 already use the property like I described.

I don't have an objection to "bus-reset-gpios" it would be trivial for 
me to spin a v5 with the naming changed if everyone is in agreement 
(given my timezone I might just send out a v5 with this change and then 
it can be argued whether to apply v4 or v5).