[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <653ad255b805_780ef2942c@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>
Date:   Thu, 26 Oct 2023 13:55:49 -0700
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:     Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
        Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>
CC:     Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
        Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
        Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
        "Ard Biesheuvel" <ardb@...nel.org>, <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH RFC v2 1/3] cxl/trace: Remove uuid from event trace known
 events
Ira Weiny wrote:
> The uuid printed in the well known events is redundant.  The uuid
> defines what the event was.
> 
> Remove the uuid from the known events and only report it in the generic
> event as it remains informative there.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
Looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists