[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <653ad255b805_780ef2942c@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 13:55:49 -0700
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>
CC: Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
"Ard Biesheuvel" <ardb@...nel.org>, <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH RFC v2 1/3] cxl/trace: Remove uuid from event trace known
events
Ira Weiny wrote:
> The uuid printed in the well known events is redundant. The uuid
> defines what the event was.
>
> Remove the uuid from the known events and only report it in the generic
> event as it remains informative there.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
Looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists