linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH next v2 1/3] ethtool: Implement ethtool

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 27 Oct 2023 01:25:48 +0300
From:   Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To:     Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
Cc:     GR-Linux-NIC-Dev@...vell.com, UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, oss-drivers@...igine.com,
        linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH next v2 1/3] ethtool: Implement ethtool_puts()

On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 03:09:59PM -0700, Justin Stitt wrote:
> Should I undo this? I want my patch against next since it's targeting
> some stuff in-flight over there. BUT, I also want ethtool_puts() to be
> directly below ethtool_sprintf() in the source code. What to do?

(removing everyone except the lists from CC, I don't want to go to email
arest because of spamming too many recipients)

What is the stuff in-flight in next that this is targeting?

And why would anything prevent you from putting ethtool_puts() directly
below ethtool_sprintf()?