[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXR1K9+HsJcq+E=BLJpNpgF2vgYY0kv2_2H85oGq6wpXQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 10:03:52 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Cc: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@....nxp.com>,
"sboyd@...nel.org" <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"abelvesa@...nel.org" <abelvesa@...nel.org>,
"mturquette@...libre.com" <mturquette@...libre.com>,
"clement.leger@...tlin.com" <clement.leger@...tlin.com>,
"sudeep.holla@....com" <sudeep.holla@....com>,
"cristian.marussi@....com" <cristian.marussi@....com>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"pure.logic@...us-software.ie" <pure.logic@...us-software.ie>,
"a.fatoum@...gutronix.de" <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>,
"aford173@...il.com" <aford173@...il.com>,
"absahu@...eaurora.org" <absahu@...eaurora.org>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: clk-conf: bypass setting rate/parent if already same
Hi Peng,
On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 10:01 AM Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com> wrote:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: clk-conf: bypass setting rate/parent if already same
> > On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 8:35 AM Peng Fan (OSS) <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
> > wrote:
> > > From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > >
> > > If the original rate and parent is already the same as what users
> > > wanna to configure through assigned clock rate and parent, there is no
> > > need to configure them again which may cause more cpu cycles or more
> > > SCMI RPC calls.
> > >
> > > So check the rate and parent first, and bypass when the original rate
> > > and parent are same as requested by device tree node.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> > /**
> > * clk_get_rate - obtain the current clock rate (in Hz) for a clock source.
> > * This is only valid once the clock source has been enabled.
> > * @clk: clock source
> > */
> >
> > So at least the second part is not guaranteed to work?
>
> I am not sure, but seems there is no clk enabled check in clk_get_rate
> function.
There is indeed no such check. On most hardware, clk_get_rate()
works fine when the clock is disabled, but that is not guaranteed to
work everywhere.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists