linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 2/2] tty: n_gsm: add partial copyright Siemens Mobility GmbH

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DB9PR10MB5881CB4D0C0607507373B824E0DDA@DB9PR10MB5881.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date:   Thu, 26 Oct 2023 08:40:39 +0000
From:   "Starke, Daniel" <daniel.starke@...mens.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     "linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        "jirislaby@...nel.org" <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
        "ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com" <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] tty: n_gsm: add partial copyright Siemens Mobility
 GmbH

> > + * Portions Copyright (c) 2022/23 Siemens Mobility GmbH
> 
> I have no objection to you adding your copyright, you all have done a
> ton of great work here and it is correct to add.  But the "Portions"
> line is odd, and isn't something we generally use.  Can you just resend
> this with that word removed?
> 
> >   *
> >   *	* THIS IS A DEVELOPMENT SNAPSHOT IT IS NOT A FINAL RELEASE *
> >   *
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/gsmmux.h b/include/uapi/linux/gsmmux.h
> > index 4c878d84dbda..101ebd15954e 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/gsmmux.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/gsmmux.h
> > @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
> >  /* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note */
> > +/* Portions Copyright (c) 2022/23 Siemens Mobility GmbH */
> 
> Same here, just drop the "Portions"?

This was something suggested by our IP department. But sure, I will resend
this patch without the word included.

Best regards,
Daniel Starke