linux-kernel - Re: [RFC/REFACT] Refactoring and significantly reducing code complexity

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZTm9qHGIyRgaF/hL@fedora>
Date:   Thu, 26 Oct 2023 09:15:20 +0800
From:   Wang Jinchao <wangjinchao@...sion.com>
To:     Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>
CC:     Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
        <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <stone.xulei@...sion.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC/REFACT] Refactoring and significantly reducing code
 complexity

On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 02:13:43PM -0400, Daniel Jordan wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 09:17:59AM +0800, Wang Jinchao wrote:
> > This is just a design idea, because I am not familiar with IPsec, I haven't 
> > tested it in a real network environment yet. 
> 
> Out of curiosity, what's your use case for padata?
When I wrote the rfc_v1 on September 28th, I only used the "pcrypt_aead01" 
test case from LTP. Thank you for you and Steffen's responses. I now have
more test cases, but I haven't tested them yet.