| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <169831316116.3135.4513340353733211586.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 09:39:21 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: David Lazar <dlazar@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: x86/urgent] x86/i8259: Skip probing when ACPI/MADT advertises
PCAT compatibility
The following commit has been merged into the x86/urgent branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 38d54ecfe293ed8bb26d05e6f0270a0aaa6656c6
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/38d54ecfe293ed8bb26d05e6f0270a0aaa6656c6
Author: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
AuthorDate: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 23:04:15 +02:00
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitterDate: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 11:31:45 +02:00
x86/i8259: Skip probing when ACPI/MADT advertises PCAT compatibility
David and a few others reported that on certain newer systems some legacy
interrupts fail to work correctly.
Debugging revealed that the BIOS of these systems leaves the legacy PIC in
uninitialized state which makes the PIC detection fail and the kernel
switches to a dummy implementation.
Unfortunately this fallback causes quite some code to fail as it depends on
checks for the number of legacy PIC interrupts or the availability of the
real PIC.
In theory there is no reason to use the PIC on any modern system when
IO/APIC is available, but the dependencies on the related checks cannot be
resolved trivially and on short notice. This needs lots of analysis and
rework.
The PIC detection has been added to avoid quirky checks and force selection
of the dummy implementation all over the place, especially in VM guest
scenarios. So it's not an option to revert the relevant commit as that
would break a lot of other scenarios.
One solution would be to try to initialize the PIC on detection fail and
retry the detection, but that puts the burden on everything which does not
have a PIC.
Fortunately the ACPI/MADT table header has a flag field, which advertises
in bit 0 that the system is PCAT compatible, which means it has a legacy
8259 PIC.
Evaluate that bit and if set avoid the detection routine and keep the real
PIC installed, which then gets initialized (for nothing) and makes the rest
of the code with all the dependencies work again.
Fixes: e179f6914152 ("x86, irq, pic: Probe for legacy PIC and set legacy_pic appropriately")
Reported-by: David Lazar <dlazar@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Tested-by: David Lazar <dlazar@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218003
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/875y2u5s8g.ffs@tglx
---
arch/x86/include/asm/i8259.h | 2 ++-
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 3 +++-
arch/x86/kernel/i8259.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
3 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/i8259.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/i8259.h
index 637fa1d..c715097 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/i8259.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/i8259.h
@@ -69,6 +69,8 @@ struct legacy_pic {
void (*make_irq)(unsigned int irq);
};
+void legacy_pic_pcat_compat(void);
+
extern struct legacy_pic *legacy_pic;
extern struct legacy_pic null_legacy_pic;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
index 2a0ea38..c55c0ef 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
@@ -148,6 +148,9 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_madt(struct acpi_table_header *table)
pr_debug("Local APIC address 0x%08x\n", madt->address);
}
+ if (madt->flags & ACPI_MADT_PCAT_COMPAT)
+ legacy_pic_pcat_compat();
+
/* ACPI 6.3 and newer support the online capable bit. */
if (acpi_gbl_FADT.header.revision > 6 ||
(acpi_gbl_FADT.header.revision == 6 &&
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/i8259.c b/arch/x86/kernel/i8259.c
index 30a5520..c20d183 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/i8259.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/i8259.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@
*/
static void init_8259A(int auto_eoi);
+static bool pcat_compat __ro_after_init;
static int i8259A_auto_eoi;
DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(i8259A_lock);
@@ -299,15 +300,32 @@ static void unmask_8259A(void)
static int probe_8259A(void)
{
+ unsigned char new_val, probe_val = ~(1 << PIC_CASCADE_IR);
unsigned long flags;
- unsigned char probe_val = ~(1 << PIC_CASCADE_IR);
- unsigned char new_val;
+
+ /*
+ * If MADT has the PCAT_COMPAT flag set, then do not bother probing
+ * for the PIC. Some BIOSes leave the PIC uninitialized and probing
+ * fails.
+ *
+ * Right now this causes problems as quite some code depends on
+ * nr_legacy_irqs() > 0 or has_legacy_pic() == true. This is silly
+ * when the system has an IO/APIC because then PIC is not required
+ * at all, except for really old machines where the timer interrupt
+ * must be routed through the PIC. So just pretend that the PIC is
+ * there and let legacy_pic->init() initialize it for nothing.
+ *
+ * Alternatively this could just try to initialize the PIC and
+ * repeat the probe, but for cases where there is no PIC that's
+ * just pointless.
+ */
+ if (pcat_compat)
+ return nr_legacy_irqs();
+
/*
- * Check to see if we have a PIC.
- * Mask all except the cascade and read
- * back the value we just wrote. If we don't
- * have a PIC, we will read 0xff as opposed to the
- * value we wrote.
+ * Check to see if we have a PIC. Mask all except the cascade and
+ * read back the value we just wrote. If we don't have a PIC, we
+ * will read 0xff as opposed to the value we wrote.
*/
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&i8259A_lock, flags);
@@ -429,5 +447,9 @@ static int __init i8259A_init_ops(void)
return 0;
}
-
device_initcall(i8259A_init_ops);
+
+void __init legacy_pic_pcat_compat(void)
+{
+ pcat_compat = true;
+}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists