linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] i2c: thunderx: Marvell thunderx i2c changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20231026125429.GA22428@Dell2s-9>
Date:   Thu, 26 Oct 2023 05:54:29 -0700
From:   Piyush Malgujar <pmalgujar@...vell.com>
To:     Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
CC:     <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <rric@...nel.org>, <cchavva@...vell.com>, <sgarapati@...vell.com>,
        <jannadurai@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] i2c: thunderx: Marvell thunderx i2c changes

On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 10:14:40PM +0200, Andi Shyti wrote:
> Hi Piyush,
> 
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 05:00:00AM -0700, Piyush Malgujar wrote:
> > The changes are for Marvell OcteonTX2 SOC family:
> > 
> > - Handling clock divisor logic using subsytem ID
> > - Support for high speed mode
> > - Handle watchdog timeout
> > - Added ioclk support
> > 
> > Changes since V1:
> > - Addressed comments, added defines as required
> > - Removed unnecessary code
> > - Added a patch to support ioclk if sclk not present in ACPI table
> > 
> > Piyush Malgujar (1):
> >   i2c: thunderx: Adding ioclk support
> > 
> > Suneel Garapati (3):
> >   i2c: thunderx: Clock divisor logic changes
> >   i2c: thunderx: Add support for High speed mode
> >   i2c: octeon: Handle watchdog timeout
> > 
> >  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon-core.c     | 96 ++++++++++++++++++------
> >  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon-core.h     | 27 +++++++
> >  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-thunderx-pcidrv.c | 23 ++++--
> >  3 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> 
> I was going through the patches that failed to receive an answer,
> is this series still valid? Do you still need a round of review
> here?
> 
> Andi

Hi Andi,

Yes, these patches are still valid. These have been acked by you
and were waiting to get reply from Robert.
Please review the patches.

Thanks,
Piyush