[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <htdwp25oqvy6vmp6ff2z7ycmckvem2ejhitqonjgfzinqv5nds@rlfuary2ouc3>
Date: Wed, 25 Oct 2023 19:15:21 -0700
From: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
To: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, agross@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org,
jonathan@...ek.ca, konrad.dybcio@...aro.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, mturquette@...libre.com,
quic_tdas@...cinc.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3.1 3/4] clk: qcom: camcc-sc8280xp: Add sc8280xp CAMCC
On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 10:40:04AM +0100, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 24/10/2023 01:34, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Bryan O'Donoghue (2023-10-23 08:38:20)
> > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/camcc-sc8280xp.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/camcc-sc8280xp.c
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..0631bd5fad57
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/camcc-sc8280xp.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,3048 @@
> > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > > +/*
> > > + * Copyright (c) 2021, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
> > > + * Copyright (c) 2023, Linaro Ltd.
> > > + */
> > > +
> > > +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> > > +#include <linux/err.h>
> >
> > Is this include used?
> >
> > > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > > +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> >
> > Should be mod_devicetable.h instead?
> >
> > > +#include <linux/of.h>
> >
> > Is this include used?
> >
> > > +#include <linux/pm_clock.h>
> > > +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> > > +#include <linux/regmap.h>
> > > +#include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
> >
> > This got included twice.
> >
> > > +
> > > +#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,sc8280xp-camcc.h>
> > > +
> > > +#include "clk-alpha-pll.h"
>
> You're right, I didn't scrub the autogen headers.
>
> Update sent as v3.2.
>
Resubmitting one of the four patches as 3.2 confuses both me and the
tools. Please send a v4 of all 4 patches instead.
Regards,
Bjorn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists