[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtBJRT56dL7+UW-viZuK3wKfGimQfrkvtuCQ_20g4N5LPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 17:13:31 +0200
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Cc: linux@...linux.org.uk, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
paul.walmsley@...ive.com, palmer@...belt.com,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, sudeep.holla@....com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, rafael@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com,
vschneid@...hat.com, viresh.kumar@...aro.org, lenb@...nel.org,
robert.moore@...el.com, lukasz.luba@....com,
ionela.voinescu@....com, pierre.gondois@....com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, acpica-devel@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
conor.dooley@...rochip.com, suagrfillet@...il.com,
ajones@...tanamicro.com, lftan@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] cpufreq/schedutil: use a fixed reference frequency
On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 at 22:13, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com> wrote:
>
> On 18/10/2023 18:25, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > cpuinfo.max_freq can change at runtime because of boost as an example. This
> > implies that the value could be different than the one that has been
> > used when computing the capacity of a CPU.
> >
> > The new arch_scale_freq_ref() returns a fixed and coherent reference
> > frequency that can be used when computing a frequency based on utilization.
> >
> > Use this arch_scale_freq_ref() when available and fallback to
> > policy otherwise.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
> > Tested-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
> >
> > ---
> > kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> > index 458d359f5991..6e4030482ae8 100644
> > --- a/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> > +++ b/kernel/sched/cpufreq_schedutil.c
> > @@ -114,6 +114,28 @@ static void sugov_deferred_update(struct sugov_policy *sg_policy)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +/**
> > + * cpufreq_get_capacity_ref_freq - get the reference frequency of a given CPU that
>
> s/cpufreq_get_capacity_ref_freq/get_capacity_ref_freq
>
> s/of a given CPU/for a given cpufreq policy ? (of which the CPU managing
> it is used for the arch_scale_freq_ref() call in the function.
>
> > + * has been used to correlate frequency and compute capacity.
> > + * @policy: the cpufreq policy of the CPU in question.
> > + * @use_current: Fallback to current freq instead of policy->cpuinfo.max_freq.
>
> Looks like use_current does not exists as a parameter.
Thanks for the review. I'm going to apply your comments
>
> > + *
> > + * Return: the reference CPU frequency to compute a capacity.
> > + */
> > +static __always_inline
> > +unsigned long get_capacity_ref_freq(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> > +{
> > + unsigned int freq = arch_scale_freq_ref(policy->cpu);
> > +
> > + if (freq)
> > + return freq;
> > +
> > + if (arch_scale_freq_invariant())
> > + return policy->cpuinfo.max_freq;
> > +
> > + return policy->cur;
> > +}
>
> Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists