lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFULd4ZLBtdJSQb2wfq=xFPEWPYT4TX306qfeoUL7LJ3Naq3AA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 26 Oct 2023 19:59:14 +0200
From:   Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>
To:     Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] x86/stackprotector/32: Remove stack protector
 test script

On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 6:01 PM Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Test for compiler support directly in Kconfig.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>

Reviewed-by: Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>

> ---
>  arch/x86/Kconfig                          | 2 +-
>  scripts/gcc-x86_32-has-stack-protector.sh | 8 --------
>  2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100755 scripts/gcc-x86_32-has-stack-protector.sh
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> index 5ef081aa12ac..039872be1630 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig
> @@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ config PGTABLE_LEVELS
>  config CC_HAS_SANE_STACKPROTECTOR
>         bool
>         default $(success,$(srctree)/scripts/gcc-x86_64-has-stack-protector.sh $(CC) $(CLANG_FLAGS)) if 64BIT
> -       default $(success,$(srctree)/scripts/gcc-x86_32-has-stack-protector.sh $(CC) $(CLANG_FLAGS))
> +       default $(cc-option,-mstack-protector-guard-reg=fs -mstack-protector-guard-symbol=__stack_chk_guard)
>         help
>           We have to make sure stack protector is unconditionally disabled if
>           the compiler produces broken code or if it does not let us control
> diff --git a/scripts/gcc-x86_32-has-stack-protector.sh b/scripts/gcc-x86_32-has-stack-protector.sh
> deleted file mode 100755
> index 825c75c5b715..000000000000
> --- a/scripts/gcc-x86_32-has-stack-protector.sh
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1,8 +0,0 @@
> -#!/bin/sh
> -# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> -
> -# This requires GCC 8.1 or better.  Specifically, we require
> -# -mstack-protector-guard-reg, added by
> -# https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81708
> -
> -echo "int foo(void) { char X[200]; return 3; }" | $* -S -x c -c -m32 -O0 -fstack-protector -mstack-protector-guard-reg=fs -mstack-protector-guard-symbol=__stack_chk_guard - -o - 2> /dev/null | grep -q "%fs"
> --
> 2.41.0
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ